Trending Topics

      Next match: Villa v LFC [Premier League] Mon 13th May @ 8:00 pm
      Villa Park

      Today is the 10th of May and on this date LFC's match record is P17 W10 D3 L4

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Are LFC genuinely interested?

      Yes we are ready to go head to head to sign him
      49 (44.1%)
      No, it's PR spin
      62 (55.9%)

      Total Members Voted: 109

      Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)

      Read 264920 times
      0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
      KS67
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,475 posts | 463 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #598: Jun 06, 2017 09:33:38 pm
      Southampton digging a good negotiating position.

      We'll have to pay for the 'insult' of the 'tapping up'...

      John Cross even says that Van Dijk met with four clubs, why aren't they on the receiving end of a complaint?

      Because Van Dijk has publicly undermined their negotiating position.

      Southampton will withdraw the complaint in the event of us paying more than £50m now.

      Now, whether or not Liverpool can hold their noses and do the deal is what will be the real test...

      I'm genuinely hopefully they've learned but lets see!
      5timesacharm
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 4,507 posts | 948 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #599: Jun 06, 2017 09:47:28 pm
      Southampton digging a good negotiating position.

      We'll have to pay for the 'insult' of the 'tapping up'...

      John Cross even says that Van Dijk met with four clubs, why aren't they on the receiving end of a complaint?

      Because Van Dijk has publicly undermined their negotiating position.

      Southampton will withdraw the complaint in the event of us paying more than £50m now.

      Now, whether or not Liverpool can hold their noses and do the deal is what will be the real test...

      I'm genuinely hopefully they've learned but lets see!

      More like digging their own grave given how much business we do there. Cancel the Direct Debit, they'll soon drop the accusation.
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #600: Jun 06, 2017 09:49:20 pm
      Give them Moreno as a sorry present  :lmao:
      HScRed1
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 20,199 posts | 4408 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #601: Jun 06, 2017 09:53:10 pm
      Load of bollocks Jürgen has more style than to meet in that dump called Blackpool  ;)
      srslfc
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 32,296 posts | 4942 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #602: Jun 06, 2017 10:02:05 pm
      Mirror are saying Klopp was contacting Van Djik and not Southampton FC. If true that is shockingly bad. If false Mirror wants putting in the bin with the S*n.

      Not really shocking at all as it's probably been going on as long as transfers existed.

      What's puzzling me is after we have convinced VVD on coming to us we never bothered actually putting a bid in to buy him.
      JD
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 39,662 posts | 6960 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #603: Jun 06, 2017 10:04:46 pm
      I can't understand why folks get all tangled up in the transfer thread

      It's perfectly fine to discuss potential targets, what they can bring to the team etc.

      But I'm not a fan of the no marks on twitter claiming to have inside info. Last seasons signings proved that wasn't the case.
      GERNS
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 12,365 posts | 1538 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #604: Jun 06, 2017 10:51:58 pm
      I personally think saints board fired this out into the public domain to try and dirty the water between the two clubs just to hold us off while we are stalking them for players !
      The Real Donavan Ried
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 5,120 posts | 949 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #605: Jun 06, 2017 11:00:30 pm
      Can't make this crap up.....

      I don't see anything different in the way this was reported than any other transfer window for any other team. Sounds like sour grapes on the Saint's part but of course it would have to be difficult.


      https://www.thisisanfield.com/2017/06/southampton-ask-premier-league-to-investigate-illegal-approach-from-liverpool-over-Jürgen-klopps-involvement-in-virgil-van-dijk-chase/
      Don't understand this.... Are we not the top bidder?... Chelsea's bid is lower right?....Money wise are Southampton not shooting themselves in the foot?... Something under hand going on here
      Dadorious
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,882 posts | 1545 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #606: Jun 06, 2017 11:14:07 pm
      Yawn.

      It's all put to bed if Virgil puts in a transfer request.
      Scottbot
      • Forum Legend - Dalglish
      • *****

      • 9,620 posts | 2159 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #607: Jun 07, 2017 06:17:58 am
      Don't understand this.... Are we not the top bidder?... Chelsea's bid is lower right?....Money wise are Southampton not shooting themselves in the foot?... Something under hand going on here


      Doesn't look like we have made a bid as yet and that is what has goat Saints goat up. The club should have followed up with a bid yesterday in my opinion and save all this stupidity. I suspect this will rumble in for a while now.
      bigvYNWA
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,795 posts | 994 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #608: Jun 07, 2017 06:54:20 am
      Still remember Fabregas being borderline assaulted with a Barca jersey at Spain cup celebrations and nothing came of it, but sure THIS is illegal tapping up. What a crock.

      Hope he goes full piss take and smashes a hat trick past them from corners next season.
      MarkMitt
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 2,800 posts | 337 
      • Give it your best every time!
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #609: Jun 07, 2017 07:36:56 am
      Still remember Fabregas being borderline assaulted with a Barca jersey at Spain cup celebrations and nothing came of it, but sure THIS is illegal tapping up. What a crock.

      Hope he goes full piss take and smashes a hat trick past them from corners next season.

      Ah, but will they be own goals? 😎

      bigvYNWA
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 16,795 posts | 994 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #610: Jun 07, 2017 07:45:54 am
      Ah, but will they be own goals? 😎



      :lmao:

      Either or, fine by me :D
      bad boy bubby
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 14,564 posts | 3172 
      • @KaiserQueef
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #611: Jun 07, 2017 08:32:43 am
      What's puzzling me is after we have convinced VVD on coming to us we never bothered actually putting a bid in to buy him.

      "Publicly courted"? "Done deal"? "No actual bid"? "Seller looking a premium for 'insult'"?

      If true that sounds way too much like the Dempsey debacle Si. 😯
      Billo
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 10,703 posts | 894 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #612: Jun 07, 2017 10:19:17 am
      Wanna have a laugh? Take a look at saints forum.
      Haha losers. I can almost taste the salty tears.
      wellbuilt
      • Forum Legend - Benitez
      • *****

      • 1,154 posts | 138 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #613: Jun 07, 2017 10:36:13 am
      Wanna have a laugh? Take a look at saints forum.
      Haha losers. I can almost taste the salty tears.

      do people actually spend the time to go on other team forums? what for?
      beardo number 7
      • Forum Kevin Keegan
      • ***

      • 343 posts | 96 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #614: Jun 07, 2017 10:38:21 am
      To be fair I've just looked,there are some in there who don't know their arse from their elbow but the more informed and sensible saints fans in there see it pretty much as it is? Southampton FC are just posturing and trying to make themselves look clever 🤣
      Billo
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 10,703 posts | 894 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #615: Jun 07, 2017 04:07:52 pm
      Yawn.

      It's all put to bed if Virgil puts in a transfer request.

      Not really, he has five years on his contract. So Southampton can do whatever they want if they want. And yes contract these days do matter if the club is willing to force their hand.
      Billo
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 10,703 posts | 894 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #616: Jun 07, 2017 04:09:37 pm
      do people actually spend the time to go on other team forums? what for?


      To read the other point of view, atleast that was the reason then I came across the thread and 90% of posts were F**k Liverpool. They really do love us, they are becoming bitter and it's funny.
      mcarz
      • Forum Legend - Paisley
      • *****

      • 17,179 posts | 1355 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #617: Jun 07, 2017 05:34:56 pm
      Not really, he has five years on his contract. So Southampton can do whatever they want if they want. And yes contract these days do matter if the club is willing to force their hand.

      Again, Van Dijk is stupid for agreeing to such a lengthy contract.
      RC9
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 9,927 posts | 823 
      • Formerly known as Vtorres, Vsuarez, and Vsterling.
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #618: Jun 07, 2017 06:49:50 pm
      We've officially ended interest and apologized to them.

      Sounds to me like Klopp did tap him up.
      LFC-LCFC
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,766 posts | 128 
      • Adopted Scouser
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #619: Jun 07, 2017 06:50:51 pm
      Looks like we've ballsed it.
      Ribapuru
      • Banned
      • *****

      • 10,843 posts | 1371 
      Re: Virgil Van Dijk (Southampton)
      Reply #620: Jun 07, 2017 06:51:36 pm
      Klopp really stupid here. We should have just pay asking price not break rules. If Barca started texting Coutinho we would be pretty livid.

      Quick Reply