Arsenal lose High Court battle after applying to hold twice as many concerts at the Emirates Stadium

• Arsenal wanted to hold six concerts at the Emirates
• Islington Council rejected their application and a court battle ensued
• The Gunners have been unsuccessful and will be allowed to host just three concerts at their north London home
• The £42.5million signing of Mesut Ozil was cited as a reason for the club not needing to earn more income from the stadium
  

By David Kent for MailOnline

Published: 10:53 EDT, 30 July 2014 | Updated: 14:18 EDT, 30 July 2014

Arsenal have lost a High Court battle over a curb on the number of concerts that can be held at the Emirates Stadium.

The Premier League giant had applied to double the number of music concerts from three to six at its north London stadium.

Islington Council rejected the application and a planning inspector dismissed the club's appeal in January this year.

VIDEO Who needs concerts? Watch Coventry fans making a gig of their own at the Emirates

Blow: Arsenal have lost a High Court battle after applying to hold double the amount of concerts at the Emirates

Arsenal argued at the High Court that there was a 'clear error' in the decision-making process.

But its case was rejected today by Mr Justice Cranston, who delivered his judgment in London, ruling that there had been no error of law.

Opponents have voiced concerns over noise and rowdy music fans. Concerts featuring Bruce Springsteen, Coldplay and Muse have generated hundreds of thousands of pounds in extra revenue for the club.

The inspector said that if Arsenal could afford to buy a player like midfielder Mesut Ozil for £42.5 million from Real Madrid, it could not plead poverty.

At a recent hearing, Dan Kolinsky, representing the club, argued before Mr Justice Cranston that the inspector's decision was legally flawed and should not be allowed to stand.

Big spenders: Arsenal's purchase of Mesut Ozil for £42.5million was cited as a reason the club did not need to host twice as many concerts

Applying for judicial review, Mr Kolinksy submitted that the inspector had failed to apply the law correctly when he decided the proposal to double the number of concerts 'did not accord with the development plan' for the stadium.

Lawyers for the inspector and Islington argued that the inspector followed the correct approach and there was no substance in the club's challenge.

During the public inquiry run by the inspector, Arsenal chief executive director Ken Friar said the club needed the money from the gigs to perform in the extremely competitive world of football, citing Manchester United's profits at £100 million compared to Arsenal's £20 million.

Gold mine: Arsenal chief executive Ken Friar said the Gunners wanted to compete with Manchester United's £100million profits